Re: I am REALLY Getting Tired of Probes on 445 and 135
From: Lars M. Hansen (badnews_at_hansenonline.net)
Date: 11/17/04
- Previous message: Mike: "Re: I am REALLY Getting Tired of Probes on 445 and 135"
- In reply to: jayjwa: "Re: I am REALLY Getting Tired of Probes on 445 and 135"
- Next in thread: Mike: "Re: I am REALLY Getting Tired of Probes on 445 and 135"
- Reply: Mike: "Re: I am REALLY Getting Tired of Probes on 445 and 135"
- Reply: jayjwa: "Re: I am REALLY Getting Tired of Probes on 445 and 135"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 14:37:09 GMT
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 02:44:58 -0000, jayjwa spoketh
>
>Stable? Like when rebooting is the norm, required constantly (remove an app:
>reboot. Upgrade something: reboot. Change a setting: reboot. Reboot: reboot. )
>Rebooting systems aren't stable. Ever run more than 3 things to once each in
>its own "window"? reminds me of task *switching*, not real multi-tasking. The
>desktop becomes discolored. Apps hang. Parts of the OS simply "disappear". I'm
>forced into using W32 frequently, and I've used Windows since 3.1. Little has
>changed. The browser is integrated into the OS.
Odd. I have no problems with discoloration or anything else when running
a whole host of programs at the same time on my old 866MHz computer with
512MB RAM...
>months to fix even trivial bugs. If at all. How is that secure? The fact that
>there's hundreds of thousands of viruses for Windows is a testament to just
>how easy it is to gain control of the OS from outside. Spyware? Adware? Those
>are, again, purely MS Windows problems. If fact, amazingly, you can not
>connect a brand new Windows XP system out of the box to the Internet and *not*
Actually, the fact that there are more viruses for Windows is a
testament to market share and little else...
>
>Microsoft's *own machines* are infested with the same viruses that
>plague their customers:
>
>On going for several months now, the machine at IP address 207.46.98.138
>has targeted my host endlessly, attempting multiple times to connect to
>TCP port 80 with one hour, every hour. According to whois listings, this
>is the address of:
That's the MSN search engine spider looking for web pages to index. Did
you (or someone else) perhaps have a web site on that IP address??
>
>It gets better. Then this article, recently released:
>
>
> "Ten new security holes in Windows XP Service Pack 2 have been discovered, so
> get ready to insert new patches into your patch management schedule.
Patches are common to all operating systems, whether it's called an
"update" or a patch...
>DCOM. IFRAME. Adobe "steam" issue. CHM. Lsass. gdiplus. It never ends... How
>can this be secure? And last- someone having an opionion different from yours,
>no matter how strongly they feel about it, is not a "troll". This is a group
>which discusses matters related to comp. security and that is what that was.
>People will use what they will; if someone makes a statement which I feel is
>incorrect, then I will attempt to prove it wrong with the facts I have and
>what I know, have seen, or done.
Well, linux/unix has had it's share of problems as well; root-kits for a
whole host of services including bind, lpr and zlib, numerous open relay
mail servers for the wonderful propagation of e-mail spam...
Pot. Kettle. Black.
Lars M. Hansen
www.hansenonline.net
Remove "bad" from my e-mail address to contact me.
"If you try to fail, and succeed, which have you done?"
- Previous message: Mike: "Re: I am REALLY Getting Tired of Probes on 445 and 135"
- In reply to: jayjwa: "Re: I am REALLY Getting Tired of Probes on 445 and 135"
- Next in thread: Mike: "Re: I am REALLY Getting Tired of Probes on 445 and 135"
- Reply: Mike: "Re: I am REALLY Getting Tired of Probes on 445 and 135"
- Reply: jayjwa: "Re: I am REALLY Getting Tired of Probes on 445 and 135"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|