Re: DES and 3DES

From: Max Mustermann (anonymous_at_remail.amessage.info)
Date: 11/04/04 

Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 12:03:41 +0100

On Wed, 03 Nov 2004, "Jack D. Ripper" <JDRipper@spitalfields.net> wrote:
>On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 19:09:21 +0000, postminimalist wrote:
>
>> mjc wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I prefer quadruple rot-13.
>>
>> not that 3DES and AES are much better. silly newbs think consumer-grade
>> ciphers are secure.
>
> Really? Are we to understand that you are in possession of some efficient
>technique to break them, or know of somebody who does? Or are you just an
>armchair expert?

I think you misunderstood. Security is relative, and we ALL know that 3DES
and AES are nowhere near as secure as the MegaQuantum MultiVariable
PolyPsychic methods developed on the planet Garfelflax, and given to the US
National SuperduperSecret Agency only under strict oath of silence.

ooops.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: DES and 3DES
    ... > I think you misunderstood. ... Security is relative, and we ALL know that 3DES ... > and AES are nowhere near as secure as the MegaQuantum MultiVariable ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: DES and 3DES
    ... > I think you misunderstood. ... Security is relative, and we ALL know that 3DES ... > and AES are nowhere near as secure as the MegaQuantum MultiVariable ...
    (comp.security.misc)
  • Re: DES and 3DES
    ... I think you misunderstood. ... Security is relative, and we ALL know that 3DES ... and AES are nowhere near as secure as the MegaQuantum MultiVariable ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Protecting commercial ruby code with public/private key encryption
    ... > It's not the goal to make you believe it's secure. ... Myeah, I think I misunderstood what you meant (no security IP, but just ...
    (comp.lang.ruby)
  • Re: Ten least secure programs
    ... it's probably better you leave the topic alone ... I said I do not have security issues with the programs I code. ... I didn't realize you were a Linux user, ... > the most widely used and secure UNIX flavors? ...
    (Security-Basics)