Re: Anonymous surfing
From: Mike (michael.owen_at_hushmail.com)
Date: 10/24/04
- Next message: Philip K: "Google Desktop calls home - why?"
- Previous message: Gary: "Re: INBOUND PPTP through Linksys units?"
- In reply to: chris_at_nospam.com: "Re: Anonymous surfing"
- Next in thread: Who_at_his.place: "Re: Anonymous surfing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 24 Oct 2004 04:26:45 -0700
chris@nospam.com wrote in message news:<ae8ln0lco7ok53nse243ja0ktpccsdiu5s@4ax.com>...
> On 23 Oct 2004 04:27:30 -0700, michael.owen@hushmail.com (Mike) wrote:
>
> >chris@nospam.com wrote in message news:<h6pjn0term6rpbvcsbgo2g9evtjss41qls@4ax.com>...
> >> On 17 Oct 2004 01:00:30 GMT, roberson@ibd.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca (Walter
> >> Roberson) wrote:
>
> In my case, my employment conditions explicitly state that I cannot
> support activities contrary to my employers interest. I could do I
> anonymously, but I'm still breaking the terms of my employment.
Interesting! Would that include statements of political views which
might impact on the business of your employer? Can an employee
contract contain clauses that attempt to remove your constitutional
rights to free speech?
One of those things that's better left untested, I guess. Shame the
Freedom network never really took off. Quite liked that tool.
Mike
- Next message: Philip K: "Google Desktop calls home - why?"
- Previous message: Gary: "Re: INBOUND PPTP through Linksys units?"
- In reply to: chris_at_nospam.com: "Re: Anonymous surfing"
- Next in thread: Who_at_his.place: "Re: Anonymous surfing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|