Re: Probes on Port 135 and 445 continue
From: David Magda (dmagda+trace040726_at_ee.ryerson.ca)
Date: 10/22/04
- Next message: Ian Kenefick: "Re: Anyone tried Kaspersky and AntiVir together?"
- Previous message: Bit Twister: "Re: My bank uses Windows? Is "Check 21" safe?"
- In reply to: Moe Trin: "Re: Probes on Port 135 and 445 continue"
- Next in thread: xmp: "Re: Probes on Port 135 and 445 continue"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 22 Oct 2004 16:29:00 -0400
ibuprofin@painkiller.example.tld (Moe Trin) writes:
> I certainly see enough lusers complaining that IRC doesn't work
> because they block or drop port 113. I'm ignoring the applications
> used to share copyright protected material because it's often
> illegal, but that's still going to create a lot of whining.
I know of several developers who use IRC to communicate with others
on open source projects, and on their 'real' work when they want help
with an issue. Personally I would not disallow chating, but the file
transfer protocol (DCC) often used in IRC. (But that's just me.)
-- David Magda <dmagda at ee.ryerson.ca>, http://www.magda.ca/ Because the innovator has for enemies all those who have done well under the old conditions, and lukewarm defenders in those who may do well under the new. -- Niccolo Machiavelli, _The Prince_, Chapter VI
- Next message: Ian Kenefick: "Re: Anyone tried Kaspersky and AntiVir together?"
- Previous message: Bit Twister: "Re: My bank uses Windows? Is "Check 21" safe?"
- In reply to: Moe Trin: "Re: Probes on Port 135 and 445 continue"
- Next in thread: xmp: "Re: Probes on Port 135 and 445 continue"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|