Re: What runs on port 2500
From: Anon (anon_at_nowhere.com)
Date: 09/22/04
- Next message: Adam: "Subject: FS: TroyTec & TestKiller Study Guides"
- Previous message: Duane Arnold: "Re: What runs on port 2500"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Max Mustermann: "Re: What runs on port 2500"
- Next in thread: Max Mustermann: "Re: What runs on port 2500"
- Reply: Max Mustermann: "Re: What runs on port 2500"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:44:53 +1000 To: Max Mustermann <anonymous@remail.amessage.info>
Max Mustermann wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Sep 2004, Leythos <void@nowhere.org> wrote:
>
>
>>>That many connections is bizarre. It sounds like either a seriously
>>>misconfigured machine looking for network resourses randomly, or someone
>>>scanning for open ports. Is the host port 2500, or the destination port?
>>>Outbound on local 2500 might be some trojan or other critter thinking it
>>>might hide behind a network service to spread/signal. Outbound to port 2500
>>>from random ports might be something scanning for open rts, but I can't
>>>imagine why. Outbound from 2501 to random IP:2500 would indicate a
>>>misconfiguration. Maybe a munged netmask or DHCP thing. Never seen it
>>>before.
>>
>>Yea, it was outbound TO port 2500. I agree, it doesn't look good, but it
>>could be a valid connection to that service - kind of scanning until it
>>finds a server it can connect to (like P2P File Sharing services, which
>>are banned on the network).
>
>
> Know the local port? If it's 2501 I'd bet my left nut it's a configuration
> problem. Some odd situation where one machine seems to think it's local
> network consists of "the world". ;)
>
>
>>Blocking outbound 2500 at the firewall seems to have killed it, and it
>>was only happening from 1 of 40 systems on the network. Since the kids
>>brought these computers, and we cleaned them before connecting them,
>>this has been the only case of something strange outbound.
>
>
> I honestly don't know all that much about this particular service, but I'd
> be mildly concerned about breaking something by not letting a box become
> aware of it's network resources. Best case it simply quits looking. Worst
> case it looks so hard it forgets to do anything else.
>
> Just guessing mind you.
>
>
>
>
Perhaps someone is using a P2P program with a user-selected port.
Perhaps it is someone sending email - see http://tinyurl.com/6rk9e
I already have a left nut thank you :-)
A
- Next message: Adam: "Subject: FS: TroyTec & TestKiller Study Guides"
- Previous message: Duane Arnold: "Re: What runs on port 2500"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Max Mustermann: "Re: What runs on port 2500"
- Next in thread: Max Mustermann: "Re: What runs on port 2500"
- Reply: Max Mustermann: "Re: What runs on port 2500"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|