Re: MS .... this is a joke, right?
From: Tx2 (tx2newscollection-invalid-_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 08/21/04
- Next message: » mrtee «: "Re: MS .... this is a joke, right?"
- Previous message: Bruce Chambers: "Re: MS .... this is a joke, right?"
- In reply to: David Candy: "Re: MS .... this is a joke, right?"
- Next in thread: Leythos: "Re: MS .... this is a joke, right?"
- Reply:(deleted message) Leythos: "Re: MS .... this is a joke, right?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 17:05:03 +0100
In article <#ciqRU5hEHA.2340@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl>, david@mvps.org,
a.k.a David Candy says...
> No I don't, you do. Norton paid to have it there.
> They need to say they don't want it anymore
Which isn't what you said in your first reply ...
Doesn't anyone at MS know how to compose an email, or pick up the phone
and say to Symantec "excuse me but we are advertising a very old product
of yours on our web site ...."
I never said MS support the product. I never mentioned anything about
anyone paying to have it tested, or whether it passes tests to warrant
being there.
Again, you missed the point entirely AFAIC ...
- Next message: » mrtee «: "Re: MS .... this is a joke, right?"
- Previous message: Bruce Chambers: "Re: MS .... this is a joke, right?"
- In reply to: David Candy: "Re: MS .... this is a joke, right?"
- Next in thread: Leythos: "Re: MS .... this is a joke, right?"
- Reply:(deleted message) Leythos: "Re: MS .... this is a joke, right?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
