Re: **Secure** Ftp server
From: Hairy One Kenobi (abuse_at_[127.0.0.1)
Date: 07/27/04
- Next message: Mike: "Re: **Secure** Ftp server"
- Previous message: phn_at_icke-reklam.ipsec.nu: "Re: **Secure** Ftp server"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Leythos: "Re: **Secure** Ftp server"
- Next in thread: Leythos: "Re: **Secure** Ftp server"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 08:31:03 GMT
"Leythos" <void@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1b6f23ed2fa23bf598a7d9@news-server.columbus.rr.com...
> In article <QhbNc.1504$HS2.1216@newsfe2-gui.ntli.net>, abuse@[127.0.0.1]
> says...
> > "ObiWan" <anzen.NO@SPAM.gmx.net> wrote in message
> > news:2mkndaFnas89U1@uni-berlin.de...
<snip>
> > Ditto keeping the data on a non-system partition (and preferably drive).
For
> > a dedicated NT-class server, it's useful to place the boot on drive C,
the
> > data on (e.g.) D:, and the actual OS on E:/whatever
>
> We actually configure the OS on the C drive, provide no access to
> exposed accounts to it (unless specifically needed) and then create
> partitions for customers data - we have a ton of 4GB partitions for FTP
> space, and have found that SZ works great. I love the fact that I can
> speed limit users.
Got to admit that I'm not so keen on that - things like Nimda often make the
assumption that you're using c:\winnt. Moving this directory elsewhere is,
IMHO, a useful precaution.
Ditto using something other than inetpub if you /must/ deploy IIS.
H1K
- Next message: Mike: "Re: **Secure** Ftp server"
- Previous message: phn_at_icke-reklam.ipsec.nu: "Re: **Secure** Ftp server"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Leythos: "Re: **Secure** Ftp server"
- Next in thread: Leythos: "Re: **Secure** Ftp server"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
