Re: IE can be made safe ....
From: Frank Slootweg (this_at_ddress.is.invalid)
Date: 07/14/04
- Previous message: Dorsai: "Re: IE can be made safe ...."
- In reply to: Dorsai: "Re: IE can be made safe ...."
- Next in thread: Steve Horsley: "Re: IE can be made safe ...."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 14 Jul 2004 20:53:43 GMT
Dorsai <dorsai@mail.com> wrote:
> Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> banged on the keyboard until
> producing news:40f54d82$0$14251$d5255a0c@news.wanadoo.nl:
>
> > Bill Unruh <unruh@string.physics.ubc.ca> wrote:
> >> Lars M. Hansen <badnews@hansenonline.net> writes:
> >>
>
> > But apparently the free car makes one lose (sp?) one's eyesight, so
> > perhaps one should stick with the old car? (Hint: The question, i.e.
> > Jim Kennedy's, was not about IE and not even about OE, but about O,
> > and whether you/I/anyone like it or not, O has some features which are
> > not available in free MUAs.)
>
> True. But each program (IE & O) invokes the other (ie, sending an email
> from a web page, looking up a URL from an email), regardless of what
> other program you've got for that functionality.
AFAIK, that is not true! In Windows' Internet Options you can set your
browser and your mailer. Given the 'advice' in this (sub-)thread, it is
somewhat funny that in some versions of Netscape it is not possible to
set one's browser or/and mailer to something other than Netscape. (No, I
don't know if that is still the case in current versions of Netscape/
Mozilla.)
> So is it a case of losing one's eyesight, or removing the too-dark
> sunglasses :-}
- Previous message: Dorsai: "Re: IE can be made safe ...."
- In reply to: Dorsai: "Re: IE can be made safe ...."
- Next in thread: Steve Horsley: "Re: IE can be made safe ...."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
