Re: Unpatched Windows Vunerabilities
From: Juha Laiho (Juha.Laiho_at_iki.fi)
Date: 07/01/04
- Next message: Walter Roberson: "Re: Unpatched Windows Vunerabilities"
- Previous message: Dawn: "DNS based ACLs failing"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Leythos: "Re: Unpatched Windows Vunerabilities"
- Next in thread: Leythos: "Re: Unpatched Windows Vunerabilities"
- Reply:(deleted message) Leythos: "Re: Unpatched Windows Vunerabilities"
- Reply: Pat: "Re: Unpatched Windows Vunerabilities"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 17:32:03 GMT
Leythos <void@nowhere.com> said:
>Now, if you had asked, if I'm not connected to the internet - at all, do
>I need the updates/patches, then I would have said only the ones that
>directly effect your applications and devices for stability/performance.
... and wait for the first infected machine to visit this "closed, isolated"
network. It seems that in practice even isolated networks are not - not all,
at least.
--
Wolf a.k.a. Juha Laiho Espoo, Finland
(GC 3.0) GIT d- s+: a C++ ULSH++++$ P++@ L+++ E- W+$@ N++ !K w !O !M V
PS(+) PE Y+ PGP(+) t- 5 !X R !tv b+ !DI D G e+ h---- r+++ y++++
"...cancel my subscription to the resurrection!" (Jim Morrison)
- Next message: Walter Roberson: "Re: Unpatched Windows Vunerabilities"
- Previous message: Dawn: "DNS based ACLs failing"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Leythos: "Re: Unpatched Windows Vunerabilities"
- Next in thread: Leythos: "Re: Unpatched Windows Vunerabilities"
- Reply:(deleted message) Leythos: "Re: Unpatched Windows Vunerabilities"
- Reply: Pat: "Re: Unpatched Windows Vunerabilities"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]