Re: Cryptography problem
From: Gerard Bok (bok118_at_zonnet.nl)
Date: 06/24/04
- Previous message: david20_at_alpha2.mdx.ac.uk: "Re: spam list"
- In reply to: Dean Hallman: "Re: Cryptography problem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 11:31:44 GMT
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 16:24:44 GMT, Dean Hallman <deanh@sc.rr.com>
wrote:
>> Maybe tickets solve your problem ?
>>
>> You ship each of your rich clients with a unique ticket.
>> Each request validates the ticket, supplies an answer, and a new
>> ticket, to be used for the clients next request.
>
>Yes, I had considered something similar to this. But, connect the current
>search with the next search in this way could lead to "out of sync"
>problems. What if the client is uninstalled and reinstalled, for example.
>The ticket for use on the next search could be lost.
'out of sync' need not pose any problems, as you can define a
window to accomodate that situation.
How would your server distinguish between a client being
reinstalled on the same machine from that client being installed
on 10.000 hacked machines (as was your original problem, wasn't
it) ?
Re-authorizing after reinstall seems a modest requirement.
You either implement a secure identification system or you don't
:-)
-- Kind regards, Gerard Bok
- Previous message: david20_at_alpha2.mdx.ac.uk: "Re: spam list"
- In reply to: Dean Hallman: "Re: Cryptography problem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|