Re: Fully spam/virus filtered mail, and reliable outbound relay
From: Barry Margolin (barmar_at_alum.mit.edu)
Date: 06/13/04
- Previous message: James Moore: "Making an untraceable CD?"
- In reply to: John S. Dyson: "Re: Fully spam/virus filtered mail, and reliable outbound relay"
- Next in thread: Thor Kottelin: "Re: Fully spam/virus filtered mail, and reliable outbound relay"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 21:52:11 -0400
In article <cag2t0$hlv$5@news.iquest.net>,
toor@iquest.net (John S. Dyson) wrote:
> The internet 'expert' (for whatever reason) would pay more,
> but not really for bandwidth. The additional cost would be for
> maintenance, support and perhaps help to mitigate the costs
> of problems caused by mismanaged PCs.
>
> Does this make sense?
Certainly. I believe that the port-25 blocking that we're talking about
is mostly being implemented by the consumer ISPs, not the enterprise
ISPs.
-- Barry Margolin, barmar@alum.mit.edu Arlington, MA *** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me ***
- Previous message: James Moore: "Making an untraceable CD?"
- In reply to: John S. Dyson: "Re: Fully spam/virus filtered mail, and reliable outbound relay"
- Next in thread: Thor Kottelin: "Re: Fully spam/virus filtered mail, and reliable outbound relay"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
