Re: ISO 17799 / BS 7799

From: Ford Prefect (restaurant_at_end.universe)
Date: 05/25/04

  • Next message: privacy.at Anonymous Remailer: "Re: question on tls" 
    Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 23:56:56 GMT

    Stephen Thornber wrote:
    > Why the abuse, some people really do not know how to use search engines, ok
    > you'd think everybody should by now.
    >
    > We can't all be off the wall geniouses - spell ?

    Well, you are quite obiously not any form of genius as you've
    completely missed the point.

    This idiot is asking about ISO 17799 and BS 7799 standards -- and yet
    hasn't a clue on how to do a simple search or even find the ISO site.
    Come on! Either this person is a total fake and is simply
    regurgitating terms he's copied from others' posts to look impressive,
    which would explain his asking about ISO without knowing where to look
    - or he is being lazy and stupid.

    > We cant all have all of the answers
    >
    > We can all share (free BSD) our thoughts and knowledge - perhaps even make
    > life a little healthier for us all.

    If you want to spend your time doing the work for lazy people or being
    suckered in, be my guest. But anyone who appraoches me about ISO
    standards and doesn;t even have the commom sense to know where to find
    the ISO website is not someone I will waste time on.

    > So let yourself go give, like I have, off line if necessary, you help -
    > Consultancy or Free.
    > Peace is what we all want.

    Yes, but it should not have to be smothered in stupidity.

    > "Steve Firth" <%steve%@malloc.co.uk> wrote in message
    > news:1gcro2n.s3aun4hcaq2cN%%steve%@malloc.co.uk...
    >
    >>Ford Prefect <restaurant@end.universe> wrote:
    >>
    >>
    >>>What? Are you too lazy / stupid to try a search engine or -- here's
    >>>a really off the wall idea -- visit the ISO site directly?
    >>
    >>If he is, my consultancy rates are very reasonable. I speak German as
    >>well, although given the quality of Thomas's English, that shouldn't be
    >>an important factor. Email address available on request.
    >>
    >>--
    >>Having problems understanding usenet? Or do you simply need help but
    >>are getting unhelpful answers? Subscribe to: uk.net.beginners for
    >>friendly advice in a flame-free environment.
    >
    >
    >

  • Next message: privacy.at Anonymous Remailer: "Re: question on tls"