Re: Getting rid of a spyware program called "Once Dead"
From: Walter Roberson (roberson_at_ibd.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca)
Date: 05/10/04
- Next message: phn_at_icke-reklam.ipsec.nu: "Re: Windows vulnerability vs Linux vulnerability [Re: Would a firewall prevent Sasser worm?]"
- Previous message: Bill Unruh: "Re: something is trying to access my dialup modem"
- In reply to: Chuck: "Re: Getting rid of a spyware program called "Once Dead""
- Next in thread: Chuck: "Re: Getting rid of a spyware program called "Once Dead""
- Reply: Chuck: "Re: Getting rid of a spyware program called "Once Dead""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 10 May 2004 15:54:31 GMT
In article <sh3v905ge0bpd01bavt0mfedarm9q07lou@4ax.com>,
Chuck <none@example.net> wrote:
:And Ray, please don't contribute to the spread of email address mining viruses.
:Learn to munge your email address properly, to keep yourself a bit safer when
:posting to open forums. Protect yourself and the rest of the internet - never
:post your address unmunged.
I've been posting with unmunged addresses for decades (I dug up one of
my 1986 posts yesterday.) I don't see how you could say that I am
contributing to the spread of email address mining viruses, though:
not *one* of my posted email addresses has ever been on a system which has
ever had a virus developed for it.
Sure, viruses on other computers find my email address and send me
email to -attempt- to infect me. Most of those get filtered out by
my anti-spam filters, and I just delete the rest. Cross-scripting
and so on are not an issue as I use text-only email clients that do
not process attachments in any way. Text-only newsreaders too.
The viruses are perhaps -copied- to me, but they do not -spread- to me
[there is a difference!]. And if I were to munge my email address,
the systems that tried to send to the munged addresses would -still-
already have been infected.
The only rationalization I can see for your admonition is this:
that if NO-ONE ever used their right email address (nor a mechanically
deducible one) on Usenet, and were to change their existing addresses,
then harvesting Usenet as a technique would die off as being unproductive.
But I'm -expecting- people to send me email in response to my postings,
and I'm not about to go out and hire a web hosting company and put up
some kind of challenge-response "proof of humanness and good intent"
system to make people hop through just to email me. Read comp.risks --
there are known attacks on several of the visual pattern recognition
systems... and such systems violate the US ADA (Americans With Disabilities
Act) in discriminating against blind people. I expect some of my
correspondants to be visually impaired.
-- 'ignorandus (Latin): "deserving not to be known"' -- Journal of Self-Referentialism
- Next message: phn_at_icke-reklam.ipsec.nu: "Re: Windows vulnerability vs Linux vulnerability [Re: Would a firewall prevent Sasser worm?]"
- Previous message: Bill Unruh: "Re: something is trying to access my dialup modem"
- In reply to: Chuck: "Re: Getting rid of a spyware program called "Once Dead""
- Next in thread: Chuck: "Re: Getting rid of a spyware program called "Once Dead""
- Reply: Chuck: "Re: Getting rid of a spyware program called "Once Dead""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|