Re: Would a firewall prevent Sasser worm?
From: Thor Kottelin (thor_at_anta.net)
Date: 05/04/04
- Next message: Claudio: "Re: Would a firewall prevent Sasser worm?"
- Previous message: Chuck: "Re: My Save As form has an advertisement in it!"
- In reply to: Lars M. Hansen: "Re: Would a firewall prevent Sasser worm?"
- Next in thread: Lars M. Hansen: "Re: Would a firewall prevent Sasser worm?"
- Reply: Lars M. Hansen: "Re: Would a firewall prevent Sasser worm?"
- Reply: Lars M. Hansen: "Re: Would a firewall prevent Sasser worm?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 04 May 2004 22:32:46 +0300
"Lars M. Hansen" wrote:
>
> On Tue, 4 May 2004 18:07:15 +0000 (UTC), phn@icke-reklam.ipsec.nu
> spoketh
>
> >In comp.security.misc Bill Unruh <unruh@string.physics.ubc.ca> wrote:
> >> Why is port 445 open on his system in the first place?
> >
> >Becouse microsoft has it enabled and vulnerable by default.
>
> "Vulnerable by default"? What the F*** does that mean?
A default environment is one which is in effect if no substitute is
explicitly selected. Vulnerability means the presence of a weakness which is
exposed to attack. I'm leaving it to you to combine these definitions.
F***s set.
Thor
-- http://thorweb.anta.net/ IRCnet #areena
- Next message: Claudio: "Re: Would a firewall prevent Sasser worm?"
- Previous message: Chuck: "Re: My Save As form has an advertisement in it!"
- In reply to: Lars M. Hansen: "Re: Would a firewall prevent Sasser worm?"
- Next in thread: Lars M. Hansen: "Re: Would a firewall prevent Sasser worm?"
- Reply: Lars M. Hansen: "Re: Would a firewall prevent Sasser worm?"
- Reply: Lars M. Hansen: "Re: Would a firewall prevent Sasser worm?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|