Re: Can a DLL be a virus?

From: Dave Budd (ddotbudd_at_man.ac.uk)
Date: 04/30/04


Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 12:36:25 +0100

In article <f8d8d8a86365a69aad0f98a35049fad6@news.teranews.com>,
kl@nk.com says...
> I found an unofficial modification to an application which involves
> installing a DLL which I have downloaded to one of the folders in
> "Program Files".
>
> I am using XP.
>
> Is it possible for a DLL to contain malicious code?

Yes.
>
> Would installing it like this be risky?

Scan the file first, at least.

-- 
He's the hairy handed gent who ran amuck in Kent 
Lately he's been overheard in Mayfair 
Better stay away from him, he'll rip your lungs out, Jim 
I'd like to meet his tailor 


Relevant Pages

  • Re: ZIP code module without DLL dependencies???
    ... but those will require installing at least some version of WinZip. ... without having to register the dll? ... possible creation of a 'zip' module / class module. ...
    (comp.databases.ms-access)
  • Re: Can a DLL be a virus?
    ... >> I found an unofficial modification to an application which involves ... >> installing a DLL which I have downloaded to one of the folders in ... >> Is it possible for a DLL to contain malicious code? ... >> Would installing it like this be risky? ...
    (comp.security.misc)
  • Re: Can a DLL be a virus?
    ... >> I found an unofficial modification to an application which involves ... >> installing a DLL which I have downloaded to one of the folders in ... >> Is it possible for a DLL to contain malicious code? ... >> Would installing it like this be risky? ...
    (alt.computer.security)
  • Re: Can a DLL be a virus?
    ... > I found an unofficial modification to an application which involves ... > Is it possible for a DLL to contain malicious code? ... > Would installing it like this be risky? ... Lately he's been overheard in Mayfair ...
    (alt.computer.security)
  • Re: to RPM or not?
    ... >> I personally don't mind installing from source. ... I'm curisous how Windows ... Do they just assume that if the DLL is ... > Linux developers should create their own app-specific libs and NEVER ...
    (alt.os.linux)