Re: REVIEW: "Network Security Essentials", William Stallings
From: johns (johnsxxx_at_mudbog.edu)
Date: 04/28/04
- Next message: Walter Roberson: "Re: REVIEW: "Network Security Essentials", William Stallings"
- Previous message: johns: "Re: REVIEW: "Network Security Essentials", William Stallings"
- In reply to: johns: "Re: REVIEW: "Network Security Essentials", William Stallings"
- Next in thread: Walter Roberson: "Re: REVIEW: "Network Security Essentials", William Stallings"
- Reply: Walter Roberson: "Re: REVIEW: "Network Security Essentials", William Stallings"
- Reply: Ford Prefect: "Re: REVIEW: "Network Security Essentials", William Stallings"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 12:45:54 -0700
Correction: make that "acceptable loss" $48 billion
according to the Federal Trade Commission. That
is everybody I guess. Meaning what? Meaning that
you "security experts" have not a clue !!!!!
johns
- Next message: Walter Roberson: "Re: REVIEW: "Network Security Essentials", William Stallings"
- Previous message: johns: "Re: REVIEW: "Network Security Essentials", William Stallings"
- In reply to: johns: "Re: REVIEW: "Network Security Essentials", William Stallings"
- Next in thread: Walter Roberson: "Re: REVIEW: "Network Security Essentials", William Stallings"
- Reply: Walter Roberson: "Re: REVIEW: "Network Security Essentials", William Stallings"
- Reply: Ford Prefect: "Re: REVIEW: "Network Security Essentials", William Stallings"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]