Re: email scan
From: sean weintz (strap_at_hanh-ct.org)
Date: 03/29/04
- Next message: AMcDŽ: "Bad day!"
- Previous message: sean weintz: "Re: Packet sniffing problems"
- In reply to: Thor Kottelin: "Re: email scan"
- Next in thread: Martin C: "Re: email scan"
- Reply: Martin C: "Re: email scan"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 16:34:14 -0500
>
> "Results 1 - 10 of about 23,600 for nis "norton internet security". (0.31
> seconds)"
>
> "Results 1 - 10 of about 8,220 for nis "network information system". (0.19
> seconds)"
>
> "Results 1 - 5 of 5 for nis "network intrusion system". (0.12 seconds)"
>
> The times they are, etc.
>
> Thor
>
Thanks. Didn't think of that. Silly, since we use the Symantec corporate
products extensively here. There should be a law against re-using industry
acronyms like that! Seriously! Reminds me of a gag I once saw for an iris
scanner that was called "LARGE ASSED SYSTEM for EYEBALL RECOGNITION"
(LASER for short.) With a manual that describes how you must point the LASER
directly into your eye to make it work.
- Next message: AMcDŽ: "Bad day!"
- Previous message: sean weintz: "Re: Packet sniffing problems"
- In reply to: Thor Kottelin: "Re: email scan"
- Next in thread: Martin C: "Re: email scan"
- Reply: Martin C: "Re: email scan"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]