Re: fighting fire with fire as an approach to better network security?!?!?
From: Jeroen Wijnands (jeroen_at_wijnands.xs4all.nl)
Date: 03/28/04
- Next message: George Jones: "Re: Outpost and Zone Alarm warning"
- Previous message: chris_at_nospam.com: "Re: Packet sniffing problems"
- In reply to: Eirik Seim: "Re: fighting fire with fire as an approach to better network security?!?!?"
- Next in thread: Walt Howard: "Re: fighting fire with fire as an approach to better network security?!?!?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 23:21:28 +0200
In article <slrnc4lcfa.ark.eirik@kain.mi.uib.no>, eirik@mi.uib.no
says...
> Heck, if this actually turns out to be a real product, I'd like to
> get two of'em, put them on the same LAN and let them fight each
> others to see if anyone wins.
>
:-) only winner would be your local Cisco dealer I'd say.
-- Groeten/Regards, Jeroen Wijnands The fact that I post to usenet does not give you the right to spam me. Spam email will result in a complaint to your ISP. MMF spam may result in your address being published online.
- Next message: George Jones: "Re: Outpost and Zone Alarm warning"
- Previous message: chris_at_nospam.com: "Re: Packet sniffing problems"
- In reply to: Eirik Seim: "Re: fighting fire with fire as an approach to better network security?!?!?"
- Next in thread: Walt Howard: "Re: fighting fire with fire as an approach to better network security?!?!?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|