Re: Packet sniffing problems
From: Thor Kottelin (thor_at_anta.net)
Date: 03/28/04
- Next message: George Jones: "Outpost and Zone Alarm warning"
- Previous message: Dom W.: "Packet sniffing problems"
- In reply to: Dom W.: "Packet sniffing problems"
- Next in thread: chris_at_nospam.com: "Re: Packet sniffing problems"
- Reply: chris_at_nospam.com: "Re: Packet sniffing problems"
- Reply: Dom W.: "Re: Packet sniffing problems"
- Reply: sean weintz: "Re: Packet sniffing problems"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 19:54:45 +0300
"Dom W." wrote:
>
> Recently, due to the dreaded "inappropriate surfing" problem, my boss
> asked me to set up a way to monitor employee surfing habits on our
> Windows 2000 server network.
> The problem is that at my job we have
> about 40 employees using only 4 different terminals. Thus, knowing
> only the terminal used isn't much help. Each user has to enter a
> login/password to access the system. Is it just not possible for a
> packet sniffer to log this user info?
Packet sniffers can only log information present in the packets you spy on.
If you would like the persons you spy on to include their user name in every
HTTP request, you must either ask or force them to do so.
Btw., I hope you get caught and sued/prosecuted as appropriate. HTH. HAND.
Thor
-- http://thorweb.anta.net/
- Next message: George Jones: "Outpost and Zone Alarm warning"
- Previous message: Dom W.: "Packet sniffing problems"
- In reply to: Dom W.: "Packet sniffing problems"
- Next in thread: chris_at_nospam.com: "Re: Packet sniffing problems"
- Reply: chris_at_nospam.com: "Re: Packet sniffing problems"
- Reply: Dom W.: "Re: Packet sniffing problems"
- Reply: sean weintz: "Re: Packet sniffing problems"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]