Re: Good overview paper of cryptanalysis techniques
From: jealous xmp (jealousxmp_at_aol.commonplace)
Date: 03/14/04
- Next message: Ron Lowe: "Re: Strange firewall messages ("tcpip")"
- Previous message: jealous xmp: "Re: IP Spoofing questions"
- In reply to: David Comma: "Good overview paper of cryptanalysis techniques"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 14 Mar 2004 02:04:24 GMT
>Could someone point me to one or more overview papers that describe
>the current knowledge about cryptanalysis techniques?
>
You might look at Schneier's (sp?) site. He wrote Applied Cryptography which
is a good overview. It does not go into depth, but hopefully would give
references to papers.
>I have written application software that does encryption of static
>data using openssl and Java crypto libraries using standard techniques
>like symmetric key encryption (AES/3DES in CBC mode) with public key
>wrapping of the symmetric keys.
>
>But, I have not thought through the entire range of attacks possible
>on such data encrypted over long periods of time. So, I am not looking
>for research topics to explore further, but would like to understand
>what is possible.
>
>Here are the issues I am worrying about:
>-- the attacks possible on the data given knowledge of the public key
>(techniques like NFS and perhaps newer ones?). How long is the data
>safe from decryption?
Number field sieve?
>-- the attacks possible on ciphertext without knowledge of the public
>or symmetric keys. And, the possible attacks when the attacker has
>some knowledge of the structure of the plaintext. How much knowledge
>is needed? How does increased knowledge of the plaintext increase the
>success of attacks?
>I have read some papers on chosen plaintext attacks, but they have an
>assumption of a decryption oracle that can be queried. What if such a
>decryption oracle is not present, i.e. I destroyed all keys (say I
>ground the smart card to dust) ? What are the attacks remaining?
Known plaintext, MITM, brute force, etc.
How
>long would it take to determine the plaintext given current processing
>power?
>
>Sorry for the long post, but I wanted to give you a flavor of the
>problem as I was visualizing it. Please feel free to add more things
>to consider.
>
>And, as I mentioned in the beginning, any good overview papers that
>will get me started, will be highly appreciated.
Well "Applied Cryptography" gives some calculations on some ciphers. This
might aid you in running some numbers of your own. You are assuming a lot of
things though, computing power of the adversary, lack of backdoors in the algo,
current state of math theory, private / military vs public techniques, etc.
Michael
- Next message: Ron Lowe: "Re: Strange firewall messages ("tcpip")"
- Previous message: jealous xmp: "Re: IP Spoofing questions"
- In reply to: David Comma: "Good overview paper of cryptanalysis techniques"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|