Re: Tiny Personal Firewall - which version?
From: Ben Dei Ho (Ben_at_Deck.ko)
Date: 03/11/04
- Next message: N1POP: "Re: HD occupied?"
- Previous message: Novice: "Looking for quantifiable data on the effects of disasters on business (mostly financial services) for 2003/2004"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Piotr Makley: "Re: Tiny Personal Firewall - which version?"
- Next in thread: *Vanguard*: "Re: Tiny Personal Firewall - which version?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 02:15:40 GMT
X-No-Archive: yes
"Piotr Makley" <pmakley@mail.com> wrote in message
news:94A6E2874CC231E75@127.0.0.1...
>
> At http://www.kerio.com/kpf_download.html I found the following:
>
> <QUOTE>
> "Limited free edition. For home users, Kerio Personal Firewall 4
> is available in two flavors - the full edition and the limited free
> edition.
>
> "After installation, KPF works as the full edition for 30 days,
> after which it becomes the limited free edition.
>
> "Limited free edition does not provide the content filtering
> capabilities such as blocking pop-up windows, ads, VB scripts,
> cookies, etc. and other extra features. Please see the comparison
> table for more details."
> <UNQUOTE>
You know? That might be EXACTLY what cause KPF4 to be more stable on
WinMe...the elimination of all those extra "features". In fact, I only
wanted it for the better packet filter gui vs KPF2.
- Next message: N1POP: "Re: HD occupied?"
- Previous message: Novice: "Looking for quantifiable data on the effects of disasters on business (mostly financial services) for 2003/2004"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Piotr Makley: "Re: Tiny Personal Firewall - which version?"
- Next in thread: *Vanguard*: "Re: Tiny Personal Firewall - which version?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
