Re: Using Old OS for Security

From: Duane Arnold (notme_at_notme.com)
Date: 02/23/04 

Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 11:49:30 GMT

Micheal Robert Zium <mrozium@XSPAMX-yahoo.com> wrote in
news:q69j30tn3ki0pjqeab4ad38gsmlop84u1f@4ax.com:

> Duane Arnold wrote:
>
>>Micheal Robert Zium <mrozium@XSPAMX-yahoo.com> wrote in
>>news:tusi30pf1atm1m75sbo1okq1k2i98bc5to@4ax.com:
>>
>>> Todd H. wrote:
>>>
>>>>Duane Arnold <notme@notme.com> writes:
>>>>> Windows 9'x and the ME O/S are root based O/S(s) that were never
>>>>> meant to be on the Internet. The NT based O/S(s) are meant to be
>>>>> on the Internet and can be configured for security.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's as simple as that.
>>>>
>>>>Pay heed to what Duane has said.
>>>
>>> You're kidding, right?
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Shock someone and make a post that means something other than your
>>crying about me making a post with a binary file attached to it.
>>
>>Duane
>
> I guess you can't read. Not surprising. If you _really_ wanted to
> shock someone, you should actually post about _real_ firewalls, and
> not that broken record crap about Active Ports and hosts files.
>
> Are you mad at me because I said something to you about posting a
> binary to a non-binary group? You shouldn't be mad, you should be
> embarrassed. You should be embarrassed about your ignorance and
> arrogance. You should be embarrassed because you called Steve Gibson
> a clown, yet you can't explain why, except that you saw someone else
> put him down, and you decided to parrot their opinion.
>
> I have three simple questions for you:
> 1. Why do you think Win9x computers "were never meant to be on the
> Internet"?

Because if they were meant to be on the Internet, the O/S would have all
the features of an NT based O/S. Does it have it? Did MS take the
development of the Win 9'x or ME O/S(s) further than what they did? Do
the O/S(s) have a server edition? Win 9'x has seen it's time and it's
gone.

But you see I have been doing this since 1971 and I know this. How long
have you been doing anything with a computer period?
   
> 2. Why do you think Steve Gibson is a clown?

That's obvious, because he produced a *clown* like you. A *clueless* home
user that thinks that you know something, because you read a few things
on the Gibson site.

> 3. Are you one of the "Trackers"?

>
> C'mon, Debbie isn't ashamed to admit it, why should you be?
>

You have a strong smell of Troll piss about yourself. This is obvious and
you're looking to start a pissing contest. And NO I am not mad at you,
because you're too sorry to be mad at. I am disappointed with your
responses. It's a disappointment that someone like you has shown up on
the scene *crying* no less about things.

And the Trackers have you out classed and they know more about computers
too than you do.

You're nothing but trash on the curb that needs to be picked. Hopefully,
you have a pass to get back on the Gibson ship where you belong.

http://www.grcsucks.com/

I see that you killfile means nothing like your responses means nothing.
My killfile does mean something and you're going to hit it with a *hard*
killfile placement where you belong. So don't start changing your ID so I
can see your sorry *crying* *** again.

Duane :(