Re: Using Old OS for Security
From: Micheal Robert Zium (mrozium_at_XSPAMX-yahoo.com)
Date: 02/23/04
- Previous message: Duane Arnold: "Re: Using Old OS for Security"
- In reply to: Duane Arnold: "Re: Using Old OS for Security"
- Next in thread: Johnson: "Re: Using Old OS for Security"
- Reply:(deleted message) Johnson: "Re: Using Old OS for Security"
- Reply:(deleted message) Duane Arnold: "Re: Using Old OS for Security"
- Reply:(deleted message) Duane Arnold: "Re: Using Old OS for Security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 23 Feb 2004 01:40:24 -0600
Duane Arnold wrote:
>Micheal Robert Zium <mrozium@XSPAMX-yahoo.com> wrote in
>news:tusi30pf1atm1m75sbo1okq1k2i98bc5to@4ax.com:
>
>> Todd H. wrote:
>>
>>>Duane Arnold <notme@notme.com> writes:
>>>> Windows 9'x and the ME O/S are root based O/S(s) that were never
>>>> meant to be on the Internet. The NT based O/S(s) are meant to be on
>>>> the Internet and can be configured for security.
>>>>
>>>> It's as simple as that.
>>>
>>>Pay heed to what Duane has said.
>>
>> You're kidding, right?
>>
>>
>
>Shock someone and make a post that means something other than your crying
>about me making a post with a binary file attached to it.
>
>Duane
I guess you can't read. Not surprising. If you _really_ wanted to
shock someone, you should actually post about _real_ firewalls, and
not that broken record crap about Active Ports and hosts files.
Are you mad at me because I said something to you about posting a
binary to a non-binary group? You shouldn't be mad, you should be
embarrassed. You should be embarrassed about your ignorance and
arrogance. You should be embarrassed because you called Steve Gibson
a clown, yet you can't explain why, except that you saw someone else
put him down, and you decided to parrot their opinion.
I have three simple questions for you:
1. Why do you think Win9x computers "were never meant to be on the
Internet"?
2. Why do you think Steve Gibson is a clown?
3. Are you one of the "Trackers"?
C'mon, Debbie isn't ashamed to admit it, why should you be?
- Previous message: Duane Arnold: "Re: Using Old OS for Security"
- In reply to: Duane Arnold: "Re: Using Old OS for Security"
- Next in thread: Johnson: "Re: Using Old OS for Security"
- Reply:(deleted message) Johnson: "Re: Using Old OS for Security"
- Reply:(deleted message) Duane Arnold: "Re: Using Old OS for Security"
- Reply:(deleted message) Duane Arnold: "Re: Using Old OS for Security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|