Re: Is memcpy secure?
From: Walter Roberson (roberson_at_ibd.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca)
Date: 01/29/04
- Next message: Mark McIntyre: "Re: Is memcpy secure?"
- Previous message: Christian Bau: "Re: Is memcpy secure?"
- In reply to: Christian Bau: "Re: Is memcpy secure?"
- Next in thread: Mark McIntyre: "Re: Is memcpy secure?"
- Reply: Mark McIntyre: "Re: Is memcpy secure?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 29 Jan 2004 20:11:26 GMT
In article <christian.bau-8F210D.20071129012004@slb-newsm1.svr.pol.co.uk>,
Christian Bau <christian.bau@cbau.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
:In article <bvbo2b$ctu$1@canopus.cc.umanitoba.ca>,
: roberson@ibd.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca (Walter Roberson) wrote:
:> ANSI C -defines- long as being large enough to hold a pointer,
:> and guarantees that if you convert a pointer to a long and back
:> again (with no arithmetic operations on the long) then the result
:> will point to the original object.
:That is news to me. And to many others. Including the guys who wrote the
:C Standard.
I'll cross-check my references when I next have an opportunity.
-- I predict that you will not trust this prediction.
- Next message: Mark McIntyre: "Re: Is memcpy secure?"
- Previous message: Christian Bau: "Re: Is memcpy secure?"
- In reply to: Christian Bau: "Re: Is memcpy secure?"
- Next in thread: Mark McIntyre: "Re: Is memcpy secure?"
- Reply: Mark McIntyre: "Re: Is memcpy secure?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|