Re: Router vs. desktop firewall
From: Todd H. (comphelp_at_toddh.net)
Date: 12/31/03
- Next message: Thomas Hertel: "Re: Router vs. desktop firewall"
- Previous message: Todd H.: "Re: Router vs. desktop firewall"
- In reply to: Todd H.: "Re: Router vs. desktop firewall"
- Next in thread: Thomas Hertel: "Re: Router vs. desktop firewall"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 31 Dec 2003 11:02:43 -0600
comphelp@toddh.net (Todd H.) writes:
> Mark Adams <madams9@juno.dotcom> writes:
>
> > My question is: if I block WAN requests at the router, do I really
> > need to enable a firewall at the desktops? Since I am probably going
> > to get both, "Yes" and "No" responses to that question, please help me
> > understand the reasoning behind either position.
>
> It can't hurt, but it's really necessary.
Doh! Meant to say "It can't hurt but it's really NOT necessary."
> The primary benefit of a desktop firewall is that it can add
> something to the mix that a perimeter firewall can't -- namely the
> ability to block applications on your computer from communicating to
> the internet unless you specifically authorize them to do so.
>
> This is handy for rooting out spyware and "phone home" apps on your
> machine.
>
> Best Regards,
> --
> Todd H.
> http://www.toddh.net/
-- Todd H. http://www.toddh.net/
- Next message: Thomas Hertel: "Re: Router vs. desktop firewall"
- Previous message: Todd H.: "Re: Router vs. desktop firewall"
- In reply to: Todd H.: "Re: Router vs. desktop firewall"
- Next in thread: Thomas Hertel: "Re: Router vs. desktop firewall"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|