Re: Security through wide system use?

From: Ronaldo Vasconcellos (ronaldo_at_nospam.vasconcellos.eti.br)
Date: 12/25/03 

Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2003 08:37:20 -0200

David wrote:
> Microsoft Monopoly Represents National Security Risk, Say Internet
> Security Experts
> http://www.ccianet.org/press/03/0924.pdf
[...]

The funny thing is that Daniel Geer, mentioned in this document, was
*fired* from @Stake after it was published. What's it about, fear from
Linux? :-)

-Ronaldo

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Security through wide system use?
    ... >> Microsoft Monopoly Represents National Security Risk, ... >> Security Experts ... > The funny thing is that Daniel Geer, mentioned in this document, was ...
    (comp.security.misc)
  • Re: Security through wide system use?
    ... >> Microsoft Monopoly Represents National Security Risk, ... >> Security Experts ... > The funny thing is that Daniel Geer, mentioned in this document, was ...
    (comp.os.linux.security)
  • Re: Security through wide system use?
    ... >> Microsoft Monopoly Represents National Security Risk, ... >> Security Experts ... > The funny thing is that Daniel Geer, mentioned in this document, was ...
    (comp.security.unix)
  • Re: Security through wide system use?
    ... > Microsoft Monopoly Represents National Security Risk, ... > Security Experts ... The funny thing is that Daniel Geer, mentioned in this document, was ...
    (comp.security.unix)
  • Re: Security through wide system use?
    ... > Microsoft Monopoly Represents National Security Risk, ... > Security Experts ... The funny thing is that Daniel Geer, mentioned in this document, was ...
    (comp.os.linux.security)