Re: Security through wide system use?
From: Leythos (void_at_nowhere.com)
Date: 12/23/03
- Next message: Rowdy Yates: "Re: Security through wide system use?"
- Previous message: Rowdy Yates: "Re: Win XP Home Ed. Install, WPA, and Partitioning Questions"
- In reply to: Andrew McCall: "Security through wide system use?"
- Next in thread: James Riden: "Re: Security through wide system use?"
- Reply:(deleted message) James Riden: "Re: Security through wide system use?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 15:49:17 GMT
In article <3140c7c0.0312230212.d87f86b@posting.google.com>,
mccall@h2o.demon.co.uk says...
> Hi Folks,
>
> This isn't intended to be a troll, and I am not trying to start a
> flame... but...
>
> I received an email today from my manager pointing me to an article on
> news.com.com[1] that states Windows gets hacked more because its
> popular, and Linux isn't as popular so it doesn't get targeted as
> much.
In my experience, with both platforms (and several others) this is 100%
correct. If you consider the number of installed systems, the math
works, neither is free of defects, but Linux is almost nonexistent in
non technical locations (meaning homes).
-- -- spamfree999@rrohio.com (Remove 999 to reply to me)
- Next message: Rowdy Yates: "Re: Security through wide system use?"
- Previous message: Rowdy Yates: "Re: Win XP Home Ed. Install, WPA, and Partitioning Questions"
- In reply to: Andrew McCall: "Security through wide system use?"
- Next in thread: James Riden: "Re: Security through wide system use?"
- Reply:(deleted message) James Riden: "Re: Security through wide system use?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
