Re: PGP versus the Outlook built in secure mail?
From: Bernhard Kuemel (darsie_at_gmx.at)
Date: 12/19/03
- Previous message: Bernhard Kuemel: "why HMAC (Keyed-Hashing for Message Authentication)?"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Juergen Nieveler: "Re: PGP versus the Outlook built in secure mail?"
- Next in thread: Juergen Nieveler: "Re: PGP versus the Outlook built in secure mail?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 15:22:57 +0100
Juergen Nieveler wrote:
>
>>Anyone knows the difference in performance/security/usage between the
>>PGP system (PGP 7.0.3 or 8.0.3) and the "Secure email" that is
>>available on the Outlook Tools/Options/Security tab?
>
>
> To use the S/Mime-encryption, both of you need to get encryption
> certificates (from Verisign, for example) - this will cost money.
There are also free certificates from thawte.
Bernhard
-- Webspace; Low end Serverhousing ab 15 e, etc.: http://www.bksys.at Linux Admin/Programmierer: http://bksys.at/bernhard/services.html
- Previous message: Bernhard Kuemel: "why HMAC (Keyed-Hashing for Message Authentication)?"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Juergen Nieveler: "Re: PGP versus the Outlook built in secure mail?"
- Next in thread: Juergen Nieveler: "Re: PGP versus the Outlook built in secure mail?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
