PGP versus the Outlook built in secure mail?
From: Bo Berglund (bo.berglund_at_telia.com)
Date: 12/19/03
- Next message: Joerg Lorenz: "Mc Afee Virusscan 2004 Version 8.0"
- Previous message: Bo Berglund: "Using PGP 8.0.3 with Outlook 2002???"
- Next in thread: Juergen Nieveler: "Re: PGP versus the Outlook built in secure mail?"
- Reply:(deleted message) Juergen Nieveler: "Re: PGP versus the Outlook built in secure mail?"
- Reply: Georg Klein: "Re: PGP versus the Outlook built in secure mail?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 06:36:42 GMT
Anyone knows the difference in performance/security/usage between the
PGP system (PGP 7.0.3 or 8.0.3) and the "Secure email" that is
available on the Outlook Tools/Options/Security tab?
A frien of mine does not seem to be able to install PGP into his
Outlook 2002 and so he is suggesting to use the built-in secure email
function instead. But I am hesitant to use Microsoft security
software, there might be backdoors and what not there.
But I might be all wrong of course, so please share your experience
with this.
Thanks.
Bo Berglund
bo.berglund@telia.com
- Next message: Joerg Lorenz: "Mc Afee Virusscan 2004 Version 8.0"
- Previous message: Bo Berglund: "Using PGP 8.0.3 with Outlook 2002???"
- Next in thread: Juergen Nieveler: "Re: PGP versus the Outlook built in secure mail?"
- Reply:(deleted message) Juergen Nieveler: "Re: PGP versus the Outlook built in secure mail?"
- Reply: Georg Klein: "Re: PGP versus the Outlook built in secure mail?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Loading