We are looking for a way to secure the USB ports on PC's within our
network without disabling them. ie We would like a user to be able to
connect a digital camera or GPS devices but not a memory stick. Is
anyone aware of how this might be achieved ????
Re: Running the network stack without Giant -- change in default coming ... > to allow the network stack to run in parallel on multiple processors ... > currently unsafe without the Giant lock turned on. ... > configuration for testing out the impact of disabling Giant on MP ... (freebsd-current)
Re: What security package for SBS? ... I have a secure Windows network.... I also have a secure MacMini and on occasion a secure Ubuntu. ... With a business class firewall stripping crap off all incoming traffic and properly implemented security policies in addition to giving your users absolutely no admin rights, there is no reason to believe you can't create a secure Microsoft Network.... (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
RE: One computer two different networks ...Internet connection and one an internal secure connection tempts one ... You have a private network with no Internet for the reason that you ... in Information Security.... (Security-Basics)
Re: SMB packet and secure channel signing ... You know, in all the times that you and I have the debate on SMB Signing,... > Optionally you can do "if client agrees" and thus the signing will be ... > Just don't screw up in the process of disabling these suckers. ... SMB Signing puts a tag on each and every network packet... (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
Re: Questions on secure remote access to Fedora Core 2 ... not secure at all, because hostnames can be forged. ... The users should generate themselves key pairs for SSH access.... on the server, work on it, and then send it back. ... Linux-based, then Network Block Devices are a good idea, too. ... (comp.os.linux.security)
