Re: Check Point FireWall-1 and CCSA
From: Beoweolf (Beoweolf-spam_at_pacbell.net)
Date: 10/23/03
- Previous message: Wayne McGlinn: "Re: Check Point FireWall-1 and CCSA"
- In reply to: Wayne McGlinn: "Re: Check Point FireWall-1 and CCSA"
- Next in thread: Wayne McGlinn: "Re: Check Point FireWall-1 and CCSA"
- Reply: Wayne McGlinn: "Re: Check Point FireWall-1 and CCSA"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 10:07:25 GMT
You may have greater access to insider information, thanks for sharing your
insight. As noted in the previous post, personal observation and
opinion...speculation(?)... were the basis for several comments.
Could you address why none of the major certification text publishers,
writers have a produced/provided manuals, text - anything specific to AI-NG?
As a general rule, industry insiders are given access major revisions, so
they can provide support, again from observation...that doesn't appear to be
the case in this release.
There are many paths to competence, attending training classes (ATC) is only
one. Many candidates choose not to attend formal classes due to work
commitments, costs, time management, dearth of competent training sites with
in a reasonable distance...the list goes on. The recommended "seat" time
before attempting the exam was not at issue. Bringing it up only obscures
the real issue.The question seems to focus on giving the interested
(candidates, third party, service industry) audience sufficient time to
react to and plan for the change over.
There is no reason to doubt your point of view, but as much as previous post
indicated their source was opinion...could you reveal the source of your
information?
"Wayne McGlinn" <wayne.mcglinn@nospam.didata.com.au> wrote in message
news:3f9758ba$0$95042$c30e37c6@lon-reader.news.telstra.net...
>
> "Beoweolf" <Beoweolf-spam@pacbell.net> wrote in message
> news:y8xlb.1758$yr6.44887068@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com...
> <snip>
> Further, these changes seem to
> > be strongly linked to the revelations of the 2000 security conference,
as
> is
> > he development of NG-AI and the new test/certifications so hastily
> > implemented.
>
> The development of NG-AI tests were planned and executed over about 6
> months, certainly not hastily as you suggest. The pool of test questions
> from FP3 was supplemented with the new features of AI. As for the
> "revelations of the 2000 security conference" that was to do only with
4.1.1
> (Checkpoint 2000), nothing at all with the new code in NG. The cd is
readily
> available from resellers, try, you'll be surprised. On the cd, under the
> Docs directory are all the .pdf's needed to setup and administer the
> firewall. The CCSA Certification is aimed at Checkpoint Firewall
> Administrators with 6 months hands-on experience, not someone who picks up
a
> book, reads and then passes the exam.
>
> Wayne McGlinn
> Brisbane, Oz
>
>
--- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.529 / Virus Database: 324 - Release Date: 10/16/2003
- Previous message: Wayne McGlinn: "Re: Check Point FireWall-1 and CCSA"
- In reply to: Wayne McGlinn: "Re: Check Point FireWall-1 and CCSA"
- Next in thread: Wayne McGlinn: "Re: Check Point FireWall-1 and CCSA"
- Reply: Wayne McGlinn: "Re: Check Point FireWall-1 and CCSA"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]