Re: Problem with host command
From: Bit Twister (BitTwister_at_localhost.localdomain)
Date: 10/12/03
- Next message: Walter Roberson: "Re: Problem with host command"
- Previous message: Walter Roberson: "Re: Problem with host command"
- In reply to: Walter Roberson: "Re: Problem with host command"
- Next in thread: Walter Roberson: "Re: Problem with host command"
- Reply: Walter Roberson: "Re: Problem with host command"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 17:34:45 GMT
On 12 Oct 2003 17:01:12 GMT, Walter Roberson wrote:
>
> [Yes, I saw the other earlier reply to your posting, and I disagree
Does not matter what you think,
> with it, because 'host' does not "scan" systems,
Does not have to be a "scan"
Here are a few state selections.
http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/statutes/pe/pe0003300.html#pe001.33.01
Read 33.01. Definition (1) "Access"
33.02. Breach of Computer Security (a)
http://www.umpqua.cc.or.us/policy/oregon-law.htm
Read 1 (a) then (4)
- Next message: Walter Roberson: "Re: Problem with host command"
- Previous message: Walter Roberson: "Re: Problem with host command"
- In reply to: Walter Roberson: "Re: Problem with host command"
- Next in thread: Walter Roberson: "Re: Problem with host command"
- Reply: Walter Roberson: "Re: Problem with host command"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|