Re: More Blathering

From: Frank Slootweg (this_at_ddress.is.invalid)
Date: 09/26/03


Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 10:54:33 GMT

Walter Roberson <roberson@ibd.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca> wrote:
[deleted]
> And now for a different point of view.

  Please note that the main subject of the thread(s) was violating the
companies' security policy, not 'wasting' comapny time, resources, etc..

  I think that most people in these forums have no real problem with
using (some reasonable amount of) company time/resources. If they did,
they wouldn't be posting, would they!? :-)



Relevant Pages

  • Re: More Blathering
    ... Walter Roberson wrote: ... Please note that the main subject of the threadwas violating the ... using company time/resources. ... they wouldn't be posting, would they!? ...
    (comp.security.misc)
  • Re: More Blathering
    ... Walter Roberson wrote: ... Please note that the main subject of the threadwas violating the ... using company time/resources. ... they wouldn't be posting, would they!? ...
    (comp.security.firewalls)
  • Re: More Blathering
    ... Walter Roberson wrote: ... Please note that the main subject of the threadwas violating the ... using company time/resources. ... they wouldn't be posting, would they!? ...
    (comp.security.firewalls)
  • Re: PING was Winlogon.exe chewing up CPU
    ... > Do NOT trust this poster, Barry! ... He's been banned from the MS newsgroups ... > for violating its Code of Conduct but continues posting under other ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: Winlogon.exe chewing up CPU
    ... He's been banned from the MS newsgroups for violating its Code of Conduct but continues posting under other usernames. ... ~Robear Dyer ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)