Re: PC netOctopus: insidious version?

From: John McAdams (john.mcadams_at_marquette.edu)
Date: 09/25/03


Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 01:22:36 GMT

On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 19:14:54 +0300, Thor Kottelin <thor@anta.net>
wrote:

>
>
>John McAdams wrote:
>>
>> On 24 Sep 2003 09:43:23 -0500, roberson@ibd.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca (Walter
>> Roberson) wrote:
>
>> >If it isn't your computer and it is Marquette policy to install
>> >the software, then to remove the software would be to exceed your
>> >authorized access to the computer.
>
>> Let me guess: you are an ITS type who specializes, not in helping
>> people do what they want to do, but *preventing* them from doing what
>> they want to do.
>
>I don't think Walter Roberson meant to prevent your sysadmins from running
>netOctopus on their systems.
>
>Follow-ups narrowed.
>

I'm looking for information from a techie, not opinions from somebody
who thinks like the IT types.

If anybody has any information, I would appreciate it.

.John

--
Kennedy Assassination Home Page
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm


Relevant Pages

  • Re: PC netOctopus: insidious version?
    ... >John McAdams wrote: ... >I don't think Walter Roberson meant to prevent your sysadmins from running ... >netOctopus on their systems. ...
    (comp.security.misc)
  • Re: PC netOctopus: insidious version?
    ... >John McAdams wrote: ... >I don't think Walter Roberson meant to prevent your sysadmins from running ... >netOctopus on their systems. ...
    (comp.security.misc)
  • Re: PC netOctopus: insidious version?
    ... >John McAdams wrote: ... >I don't think Walter Roberson meant to prevent your sysadmins from running ... >netOctopus on their systems. ...
    (comp.security.misc)