Re: What corporate security software to use?

From: PCportinc (pcportinc_at_aol.combatSPAM)
Date: 08/09/03

  • Next message: PCportinc: "Re: prime numbers?"
    Date: 09 Aug 2003 14:03:16 GMT
    
    

    Puffer 3.11[briggsoft.com]
    --------------------------
    Pros:
    has auto secure wipe/delete option w/variable # of passes;
    multiple file selection(no folder selection);
    Self-extract exe file;
    Choice of 4 symmetric algorithms: PC1, CAST, Blowfish, Cascade;
    compresses encrypted files;
    public keys;
    user names output file;
    good interface;

    Cons:
    sometimes doesnt show files within folders;
    saves all selected files as archive(single) encrypted file without
    folders, decrypted files are not within their folders;
    selection limited to 1000 files;
    shows program name(PUFX) in ASCII code.

    (*1*)saves encrypted files as registered file types.

    F-secure 2.0[datafellows]
    -------------------------
    Pros:
    has secure wipe/delete options;
    uses Blowfish algorithm;
    has auto encrypt at system shutdown;
    can be accessed from windows shell.

    Cons:
    F-secure 1.0 failed to decrypt files, all were lost;
    nag screen comes up at computer shut-down;
    no choice of encryption algorithms.

    *free download no longer available*
    (*1*)saves encrypted files as registered file types.

    Kremlin
    -------
    Pros:
    has choice of 6 encryption algorithms;
    has secure wipe/delete options;
    has auto encrypt at system shutdown;
    good interface;
    variable password;
    compresses encrypted files;

    Cons:
    reveals name of program(KRM) used to encrypt in ASCII code;
    merges all selected files into one file, and names as
    last selected file name;
    only accessed from windows shell(right-click).

    (*1*)saves encrypted files as registered file types.
    (*3*)36sec to encrypt/6.5sec to decrypt htm files.

    Encrypt-It v4.00(MaeDae Ent.)
    -----------------------------
    pros:
    has secure wipe/delete options;
    good interface;
    choice of set length of encryption key;
    multiple file selection;
    selection by extension/type;
    option to rename encrypted file;
    has shredder option.

    cons:
    does not allow use of Blowfish or DES encryption algorithms;
    selected files cant be viewed.

    (*1*)saves encrypted files as unregistered file types.
    (*3*)26sec to encrypt/27sec to decrypt htm files.

    WinXFiles[pepsoft]
    ------------------
    pros:
    good interface;
    multiple file selection;
    variable password;
    has internal pic viewer.

    cons:
    does not have encryption/shred options;
    allows selection of picture files only;
    no selection by extension/type;
    algorithm is unknown;
    leaves source file name intact;
    is slow.

    *designed for picture files*
    (*1*)saves encrypted files as unregistered file types.

    Crypto v3.1(software by design)
    -------------------------------
    pros:
    program is small[240kb]
    has NSA erase option

    cons:
    algorithms are unknown (no choices);
    reveals program name, path, and name of source file in ASCII code;
    reveals that file is encrypted;
    leaves source file name and file type intact after encryption;
    bad interface;
    is slow.

    (*1*)saves encrypted files as unregistered file types.

    Norton Secret Stuff1.0
    ----------------------
    pros:
    creates self-decrypting executable file;
    program is small[618kb].

    cons:
    no options/choices;
    can process only 209 files at a time;
    creates large self-decrypting executable
    file even from small source files.

    *updates/download no longer available*

    ABI Coder 3.5[abisoft.net]
    ----------------------
    pros:
    choice of Blowfish or DES algorithm.

    cons:
    bad interface;
    leaves source file name and type intact;
    no ability to select multiple files;
    is extremely slow.

    Spytech CipherWorks 2.0
    -----------------------
    cons:
    confusing interface
    does not offer Blowfish/DES
    no multiple file selection

    SECURE 2.0
    ----------
    cons:
    is extremely slow.
    bad interface;
    leaves source file name and type intact;
    no options/choices.
    algorithms are unknown (no choices);

    Invisible secrets 2.1
    ---------------------
    pros:
    hides data/pics within a pic

    cons:
    data cant be viewed in DOS EDITOR
    need software to view hidden data

    UnBreakable Encryption (UBE)v2.1
    --------------------------------
    cons:
    confusing interface;
    no multiple file selection.

    PC Security(tropsoft) - [bad program]

    PhotoEncrypt 2.5[ZXN]
    ---------------------
    pros:
    choice of 3 encryption algorithms;
    multiple file selection by extension or type;
    generates thumbnails/slideshow;
    saves all encrypted files as single named file;
    variable password.

    cons:
    encrypted file bigger than source;
    selected files cant be viewed.

    *designed for picture files*
    (*1*)saves encrypted files as registered file types.

    Secur-all32 v4.20[ISS]
    ----------------------
    pros:
    multiple users/sys-admin option;
    multiple file selection;
    has file shred option;
    has file lock option;
    variable extension;
    selected files can be viewed;
    selection by extension/type;
    explorer interface.

    cons:
    does not change file name;
    only two algorithms, standard&DES;
    folders cant be locked;
    de/encryption is very slow;
    lock feature does not work;
    loads into memory on start up.

    (*1*)saves encrypted files as unregistered file types.
    (*3*)2m:52s to encrypt/2m:37s to decrypt htm files.

    Utimaco SafeGuard 1.11[http://www.privatecrypto.com/eng/index.html]
    -----------------------
    pros:
    creates self-extracting executable.

    cons:
    no multiple file selection;
    uses only AES algorithm;
    encrypted file bigger than source.

    ---------
    footnotes
    *1* - saving encrypted files as unregistered file types
          does not reveal the fact that the file is encrypted;
          therefore, software used to encrypt is unknown.
          However, user has to run software to decrypt it.

    *2* - if password is obscured by asterisks, press CTRL-V
          to copy/paste password.

    *3* - all tests performed on files with combined total of 1mb.

    *4* - keeps file's extension.
     
                 


  • Next message: PCportinc: "Re: prime numbers?"

    Relevant Pages

    • my crypto reviews
      ... multiple file selection. ... saves encrypted files as registered file types. ...
      (sci.crypt)
    • Re: Your preferred Security Soft- and Hardware
      ... Choice of 3 symmetric algorithms: ... Cons: ... can only hold up to 1000 encrypted files; ...
      (comp.security.misc)
    • Re: Encryption
      ... Choice of 3 symmetric algorithms: ... Cons: ... can only hold up to 1000 encrypted files; ...
      (comp.security.misc)
    • Re: x^2 vs 8x^2 (Running Time)
      ... the bubble sort is a better performer. ... Time Bounds for Selection. ... Of course, these are theoretical algorithms, of little or no ... algorithms book. ...
      (comp.graphics.algorithms)
    • Re: How G is different from...
      ... algorithms is the presence of selection, i.e. removing poor solutions ... I often emphasize selection too ...
      (comp.ai.genetic)

    Loading