Re: [NEWS] Hacker code could unleash Windows worm
From: Dazz (cashdj_at_hotmail.com)
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 22:31:27 +1000
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 11:50:00 GMT, email@example.com (Alun Jones [MS MVP])
>In article <MPG.firstname.lastname@example.org>, Neb Revod
>>You called it, spot on, my friend. The IDS has logged a huge spike in
>>attempts at ports 445 and 139 since early yesterday.
>>I've been away from the mainstream media for the last couple of days, so
>>I won't be surprised to hear that its flooded with "the sky is falling"
>Oh-so-balanced an observation on the hysterical basis of our current media
>choices, followed by a hysterical note of your own:
>>It ought to be some kind of crime, albeit a minor one perhaps, to
>>operate a system that still has these vulnerabilities.
>More appropriate would be to make it a crime to connect to the Internet
>without a firewall.
And yet you added a hysterical note of your own?
While a firewall can add an extra layer of protection, it certainly
isn't the be-all and end-all in regards to computer security.
An improperly configured firewall *can* be worse than no firewall at
all, and if the user still doesn't practise "safe" computing methods,
than even a firewall won't necessarily save them, or others, from
A firewall may help in certain circumstances, but certainly not all
>[Please don't email posters, if a Usenet response is appropriate.]