Re: 10.0.1.* alias blackhole-1.iana.org alias 192.175.48.6 ???
From: DaveK (no.spam_at_my.mailbox.invalid)
Date: 05/29/03
- Next message: Lin: "Re: See How Your Fellow Members Hack Into Computers"
- Previous message: Hans: "Re: See How Your Fellow Members Hack Into Computers"
- In reply to: jx: "Re: 10.0.1.* alias blackhole-1.iana.org alias 192.175.48.6 ???"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 20:50:57 +0100
"jx" <jx@noplace.com> wrote in message
news:banjb3$1k2pp$1@ID-32226.news.dfncis.de...
> >>It's not clear (to me, anyway) whether the original poster was trying
> >>to trace to an address on network 10.0.0.0, or to this 192.175.48.6
> >>address that he mentioned. Certainly from any network that I'm
> >>familiar with, trying to trace to a 10.0.0.0 address would not get
> >>very far at all
>
> actually, what I was trying to do was identify the origional
> common source so I could filter it out. This would also, I
> hope, provide a starting point to report to my ISP. It appears to me
> that the 10.0.* ip's are the origional senders, but I
> could be wrong. I'm no expert in header interpretation. I'm
> trying to pick this stuff up as I go along.
>
> All the 10.0.* ip's traced to blackhole which traced to
> 192.175.48.6
They are either
1) completely bogus Received: lines inserted by the spammer's software
2) genuine internal intermediate mail hops on the local network of whatever
business or organization the spammer found an open proxy on
3) genuine Received: lines from a misconfigured multihomed mail relay.
[ You can occasionally see packets in the wild with these addresses in
their source IP fields, but not in their dest IP fields. These will
generally be icmp or udp datagrams. ]
> A full set of headers follows. lifesaversdirect.com is frequently
> replaced by:
> bstnt.com (10.0.1.12)
> amazdir.com (10.0.0.11)
>
> Should the 10.0.* ip be filtered?
Not necessarily, because it will once in a while produce a false positive.
Suppose you do some shopping on the web: the large corporation that you buy
from will try and send you an acknowledgement of your order, but because
they're using an internal office lan based on 10.* numbers, there's a
received header in it with that IP and you miss a genuine email.
> or the lifesavers/bstnt/amazdir?
Now that seems like a much more fruitful idea. :)
Quick analysis of your headers:
> Received:
> from mtiwgwc20.worldnet.att.net ([127.0.0.1]) by
> mtiwgwc20.worldnet.att.net (InterMail
> vM.5.01.05.12 201-253-122-126-112-20020820) with ESMTP id
Genuine, internal routing at your own machine by the InterMail software
> Received:
> from l185.lifesaversdirect.com (unknown[63.215.88.185])
by
> mtiwgwc20.worldnet.att.net
> (mtiwgwc20) with SMTP id <2003052309363802000g22r8e>;
Fri, 23
The actual spammer's machine that sent the spam DIRECTLY to your own
machine.
> Received:
> from lifesaversdirect.com (10.0.1.161) by
> l185.lifesaversdirect.com with QMQP; 23 May 2003
The spammer has a small internal office network using 10.* addresses and
runs their spamware from an internal machine 10.0.1.161, which sends it
through an outgoing mail server at 63.215.88.185 [which I'll bet 50 qatloos
is a dynamic dialup line in some ISPs modem pool].
OR
The spammer used an open proxy / relay at 63.215.88.185 which doesn't add
a Received: header of its own, so they added a forged one of their own.
For more info on spam tracking, consult news.admin.net-abuse.email.
DaveK
-- moderator of alt.talk.rec.soc.biz.news.comp.humanities.meow.misc.moderated.meow Burn your ID card! http://www.optional-identity.org.uk/ Help support the campaign, copy this into your .sig! Proud Member of the Exclusive "I have been plonked by Davee because he thinks I'm interesting" List Member #<insert number here> Master of Many Meowing Minions Holder of the exhalted PF Chang's Crab Wonton Award for kook spankage above and beyond the call of hilarity. PGP Key-ID: 0x0FB504D1 Fingerprint 04B7 2E8C 0245 680E 6484 C441 CEC7 D2BD
- Next message: Lin: "Re: See How Your Fellow Members Hack Into Computers"
- Previous message: Hans: "Re: See How Your Fellow Members Hack Into Computers"
- In reply to: jx: "Re: 10.0.1.* alias blackhole-1.iana.org alias 192.175.48.6 ???"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|