Re: ANY EXPERIENCE WITH WebRamp 700s?
From: Jason (nospam_at_rogers.com)
Date: 05/29/03
- Next message: Martin Cooper: "Re: iptables using MASQUERADE and static IPs"
- Previous message: Thund3rstruck: "Re: ANY EXPERIENCE WITH WebRamp 700s?"
- In reply to: Calvin Lane: "Re: ANY EXPERIENCE WITH WebRamp 700s?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 21:49:36 GMT
I would recommend to use ITShield Firewall (http://www.itshield.com).
Free/Swan on Linux is not user-friendly for road warrior. The best tool for
a road warrior is PPTP VPN which makes his machine appear to be present on
the local corporate network ITShield Firewall supports IPSEC VPN and PPTP
VPN. If you consider PPTP VPN is not secure enough, you can use IPSEC VPN +
PPTP VPN. Besides it supports user authentication and remote administration.
Regards,
Jason
"Calvin Lane" <clane@nubiandirections.org> wrote in message
news:0NuBa.105$tY5.28@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
> Thanks. I'm actually considering throwing away the WebRamp and installing
a
> Linux firewall. Do you have any recommendations on what version of Linux
I
> should install? Thanks again.
>
> <thund3rstruck_n0i@hotmail.comremove> wrote in message
> news:3ed3dddc$1$70277$a04e5680@nnrp.fuse.net...
> >
> > "Calvin Lane" <clane@nubiandirections.org> wrote in message
> > news:Lzxya.14$e11.8@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
> > > I'm setting up a VPN connection into my network. I have dynamically
> > > assigned IP address from my cable ISP service. I was able to secure a
> > > domain name from one of the DNS services on the internet that allows
you
> > to
> > > map a dynamically assigned IP to a fully-qualified domain name.
> > Currently,
> > > I'm unable to access the inside of my network from the outside through
> the
> > > WebRamp 700s. I noticed that when I change to Standard mode, I can
use
> > LAN
> > > IN and allow certain specific ports into my network. When I switch to
> > > either NAT or NAT with DHCP, my LAN IN option goes away. I need the
NAT
> > > obviously to translate from the 192.168.x.x IP addresses to the legal
> ones
> > > on the other side. How do I set up the WebRamp to allow certain
> > > ports/protocols into my network, while at the same time NAT'ing my IPs
> to
> > > legal routable ones? Thanks.
> > >
> > > clane@nubiandirections.org
> >
> > Sorry that I originally missed this.
> >
> > Is there a "routing" feature in the webramp? (Been over a year since I
> saw
> > one) If so, you could just route everything coming in (ideally via ports
> > <G>) to a specific internal IP addy...
> >
> > Yes, I've been playing with the linux firewall too much. <G>
> >
> > NOI
> >
> >
> >
>
>
- Next message: Martin Cooper: "Re: iptables using MASQUERADE and static IPs"
- Previous message: Thund3rstruck: "Re: ANY EXPERIENCE WITH WebRamp 700s?"
- In reply to: Calvin Lane: "Re: ANY EXPERIENCE WITH WebRamp 700s?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
