Re: ISS Site Protector WAN Performance Issues
From: Alexander Delarge (alex_at_nowhere.com)
Date: 05/29/03
- Next message: Vladimir: "Ukraine: Fighting Cybercrimes"
- Previous message: SJ: "Re: ISS Site Protector WAN Performance Issues"
- In reply to: SJ: "Re: ISS Site Protector WAN Performance Issues"
- Next in thread: SJ: "Re: ISS Site Protector WAN Performance Issues"
- Reply: SJ: "Re: ISS Site Protector WAN Performance Issues"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 13:19:53 GMT
> Alex
> Thank you for the input, but I left out a key bit of information. I
> have several sensors distributed around the WAN over several different
> links. The SP server is at the location with the most sensors. The
> product is supposed to be scalable this way.
Well, 150 Kbps every 2 minutes isn't exactly a tital wave of traffic. You
could increase the bandwidth on your WAN links, that seems the most obvious.
You could also cut down the number of sensors. 4 sensors is a lot of IDS
capability. I am assuming these are RealSecure 7.0, 100 mbps sensors. That's
400 mbps of IDS capability being shoved through a 512kbps WAN link. I think
that's a little much to expect of any technology.
Alex
- Next message: Vladimir: "Ukraine: Fighting Cybercrimes"
- Previous message: SJ: "Re: ISS Site Protector WAN Performance Issues"
- In reply to: SJ: "Re: ISS Site Protector WAN Performance Issues"
- Next in thread: SJ: "Re: ISS Site Protector WAN Performance Issues"
- Reply: SJ: "Re: ISS Site Protector WAN Performance Issues"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
