Re: Pros/Cons Open Source Security
n1pop_at_hotmail.com
Date: 05/07/03
- Next message: Nig: "Re: HELP!!! Configuring a Backup (?) RSA Server"
- Previous message: xpyttl: "Re: using proxy - how much can IT people see?"
- In reply to: Mr Sean Ness: "Pros/Cons Open Source Security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 7 May 2003 12:28:03 -0700
"Mr Sean Ness" <s4012002@student.uq.edu.au> wrote in message news:<b9ar7v$4k0$1@bunyip.cc.uq.edu.au>...
> Hey all,
>
> I am a university student doing a report on the pros and cons of open source
> security systems. I've been searching on the 'net, and have found many good
> summaries of the argument, but I need more details / evidence. In addition, most
> websites end up favouring the pro-open source arguments.
>
> Does anyone know any books or journal articles that discuss the open source
> security debate in detail, or any sources that are actually opposed to open
> source security?
>
> Any links or references you guys could give me would be helpful.
>
> Sean
IMHO, I doubt anything will be in book form because the debate is so
dynamic. As an example, I did a Google search for "open source
security debate" and the second link was to InternetWeek which says a
study found OSS to be less vulnerable than CSS like Microsoft
products. Yet another link to a ZDNET story says OSS is more
vulnerable. The two sides will likely continue to bandy stats back
and forth, claiming the other is more vulnerable.
I did find a white paper at www.adti.net that might help you in your
quest. And you may find evidence at www.cert.org, the group
responsible for documenting vulnerabilities.
- Next message: Nig: "Re: HELP!!! Configuring a Backup (?) RSA Server"
- Previous message: xpyttl: "Re: using proxy - how much can IT people see?"
- In reply to: Mr Sean Ness: "Pros/Cons Open Source Security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|