Re: SSL vs TLS
From: Barry Margolin (barry.margolin@level3.com)
Date: 04/24/03
- Next message: Jem Berkes: "Re: SSL vs TLS"
- Previous message: DaveK: "Re: Mostly lame commands, skip to the (near) end"
- In reply to: Doug Fox: "SSL vs TLS"
- Next in thread: Doug Fox: "Re: SSL vs TLS"
- Reply: Doug Fox: "Re: SSL vs TLS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Barry Margolin <barry.margolin@level3.com> Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 17:22:27 GMT
In article <3ea8161d_4@news1.prserv.net>, Doug Fox <dfox168@hotmail.com> wrote:
>If TLS is more secured than SSL, why it is not as popular?
Momentum -- SSL was first and is more widely implemented.
-- Barry Margolin, barry.margolin@level3.com Genuity Managed Services, a Level(3) Company, Woburn, MA *** DON'T SEND TECHNICAL QUESTIONS DIRECTLY TO ME, post them to newsgroups. Please DON'T copy followups to me -- I'll assume it wasn't posted to the group.
- Next message: Jem Berkes: "Re: SSL vs TLS"
- Previous message: DaveK: "Re: Mostly lame commands, skip to the (near) end"
- In reply to: Doug Fox: "SSL vs TLS"
- Next in thread: Doug Fox: "Re: SSL vs TLS"
- Reply: Doug Fox: "Re: SSL vs TLS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
