Re: Deloder worm has resurfaced. Watch your privacy!

From: John (Yochanon@yahoo.com)
Date: 03/29/03

  • Next message: Chloe: "Re: May America lose the Iraq war" 
    From: John <Yochanon@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 21:51:52 GMT

    Nick FitzGerald, while drooling on their self, scribbled:

    > "John" <Yochanon@yahoo.com> wrote:
    >
    > Note: "Followup-To: overruled and original posting list restored.
    >
    > Note^2: A good sign to start with one is dealing with an arsehole and/or
    > plonker -- he wants everyone to see his opinion but wishes to "restrict"
    > the response of those he replies to.

      Get yourself a newsreader that actually works correctly. Anyone else who has
    replied to a post by me whether new or in a thread has had no problems. You
    sure do get pissed easy when it's pointed out how you may be wrong about
    something don't you. I've not got any "restrictions" set on *any* post I put
    up, you whiny baby.

    >
    > <<snip entire quote of my post>>
    >> What a crock! S/he put it out, because if left up to "them" (those who are
    >> supposed to fix the 'problem'), they'd never get off their asses until 6
    >> months from now! As a matter of fact, M$ has said themselves they won't be
    >> 'fixing' some exploit/bug/security flaw in NT4, because it's just too much of
    >> a pain in the *** (essentially).
    >> These things need to be exposed, so that the company(s) who make these
    >> apps/software, quit hiring sloppy/lazy/scriptkiddies, and get back to
    >> *QUALITY*, not 'how fast can you guys turn this out so we can sell it?'.
    >> Funny how the opensource community gets right on these kinds of things almost
    >> instantly, meanwhile, M$ and its cronie companies sit on it to 'see if it's a
    >> bad as it might be'. Pretty pathetic.
    >
    > Excuse me, but what -- apart from displaying your complete lack of
    > intellect -- has that to do with what was being discussed?

      <snip 'let's try to baffle them with BS'>

      My reply as a 'whole', you sub-moron, was just that. You're so full of
    yourself you refuse to 'see' or 'hear' anything but what spews from your own
    mouth or ass. If you can't figure out what my reply was about, perhaps the lack
    of any intellect is on your part. Where did I refute any of the 'technical'
    parts? If you were as smart as you think yourself to be, you should know
    *exactly* to what I was replying to. Here, let me help you. This is part of
    what you posted, and (the main) part of what I was replying to:

    "I am interested in how you justify your membership of the ISSA in light
    of its code of ethics:

       http://www.issa.org/codeofethics.html

    and your actions in publicly releasing the VNC password used by Deloder.
    I see your actions as contrary to all but the last two of the items in
    that code, specifically:

        * Perform all professional activities and duties in accordance with
          the law and the highest ethical principles;

    As no formal list of "the highest ethical principles" is given, my
    highest ethical principles must be considered as suitable as the basis
    for comparison. As I would not have released that information because
    doing so would violate my ethical principles, your releasing the
    information puts you in beach of that point of the ISSA's code."

      If you knew enough to deflate that over-sized ego of yours (wouldn't hurt your
    head any either), the 'problem' was already made public. The OP put the url,
    which by the way also contained any 'fixes'. You jumped on your ISSA white
    horse so damned fast, you forgot your sword to smite the 'bad OP'. So instead
    you try to tongue lash him with your 'I'm more ethical than you, you scumbag'
    BS. Now that someone (me) responds to a portion of your post, you've got your
    panties wadded so far up your ass, it's tearing you up!

    >
    > Given you tried to restrict my, or any other, response to your message to
    > alt.comp.virus, one has to suspect that you are vying for the "a.c.v tosser
    > of the year" award. (Perhaps you know that Sooooog has left a.c.v and thus
    > see this as the big chance for your breakthrough year vis a vis the award?)

      Given that you seem to not have the ability to understand how to use your POS
    news reader, this coming from you doesn't seem to hold much water, it actually
    sounds like you've got your hackles up thinking someone is trying to usurp the
    'award' from *you*. Like I said, there's no 'restrictions' setup on *my*
    reader, the problem is on your end bud. Also since this is cross-posted to 5
    NG's, this will be the last reply from me you read. I've had plenty of
    'battles' in NG's before, and I've *never* plonked anyone. Your irrational need
    to do so to *anyone* after just one reply to a post from you, shows a *lack* of
    intellect and/or wish to try to understand or view any points not your own, but
    feel free to keep tossing out technical points in your posts though...it's the
    hot air for that swollen head of yours.

     
    > --
    > Nick FitzGerald

      Grow up and quitcherbellyaykin. You'll survive, VNC will survive, everything
    will survive this diabolical plot by the OP and me.

      John 

    -- 
My penguin eats butterfly's.
  • Next message: Chloe: "Re: May America lose the Iraq war"
    • Quantcast