Re: computing the cost of incidents
From: Ron Ruble (raffles2@att.net)
Date: 03/29/03
- Next message: Bill Unruh: "Re: computing the cost of incidents"
- Previous message: Jem Berkes: "Re: How to hide IP address when telnet"
- In reply to: sam bailey: "computing the cost of incidents"
- Next in thread: Bill Unruh: "Re: computing the cost of incidents"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Ron Ruble" <raffles2@att.net> Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 13:35:35 -0500
"sam bailey" <usenet@entropymedia.com> wrote in message news:d1667b70.0303290906.ec1a432@posting.google.com...
> I'm doing some background research for an upcoming television program
> on computer security and in the process of reading all the interviews
> we've done with people in the field there's a wide variation in the
> damage estimates from more recent worms and things like slammer: from
> around hundreds of millions ($US) to hundreds of billions.
>
> I'm no expert on the matter but the higher-end numbers seem mighty
> inflated to me - they almost seem like they count the salary of
> everyone who's touched a system affected by the worm.
They also tend to overinflate the value of "intellectual property"
In one of the earliest hacking trials, AT&T tried to peg the cost
of a single document grabbed by the hacker at $23,000, making
it qualify for serious punishment.
The defense found out that the exact same document was available
to anyone who called AT&T, in pamphlet form, for $25.00 US.
http://www.cs.georgetown.edu/~denning/infosec/Neidorf.txt
- Next message: Bill Unruh: "Re: computing the cost of incidents"
- Previous message: Jem Berkes: "Re: How to hide IP address when telnet"
- In reply to: sam bailey: "computing the cost of incidents"
- Next in thread: Bill Unruh: "Re: computing the cost of incidents"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|