Re: mail filtering policy
From: Alun Jones (alun@texis.com)
Date: 03/23/03
- Next message: JoshB: "breakin analysis"
- Previous message: Jim Watt: "Re: mail filtering policy"
- Maybe in reply to: Doug Fox: "mail filtering policy"
- Next in thread: John Elsbury: "Re: mail filtering policy"
- Reply: John Elsbury: "Re: mail filtering policy"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: alun@texis.com (Alun Jones) Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2003 18:36:34 GMT
In article <vXjfa.46800$Dt1.44284@news02.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com>, "Doug
Fox" <dfox168@hotmail.com> wrote:
>It's not a joke. The department involved considered that it was a "show
>stopper"! We need to up the limit to 100.
Can I suggest that this would be better handled by creating an internally
managed forwarding list? This way, your customer would send one copy to one
address, and your internal mail software could do all the forwarding and
expansion of names.
Alun.
~~~~
[Please don't email posters, if a Usenet response is appropriate.]
-- Texas Imperial Software | Try WFTPD, the Windows FTP Server. Find us at 1602 Harvest Moon Place | http://www.wftpd.com or email alun@texis.com Cedar Park TX 78613-1419 | VISA/MC accepted. NT-based sites, be sure to Fax/Voice +1(512)258-9858 | read details of WFTPD Pro for XP/2000/NT.
- Next message: JoshB: "breakin analysis"
- Previous message: Jim Watt: "Re: mail filtering policy"
- Maybe in reply to: Doug Fox: "mail filtering policy"
- Next in thread: John Elsbury: "Re: mail filtering policy"
- Reply: John Elsbury: "Re: mail filtering policy"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]