Re: facial , hand , voice ,fingerprint and camera
From: chris@nospam.com
Date: 03/12/03
- Next message: Jim Grimmett: "Re: WLAN public access"
- Previous message: Lassi Hippeläinen: "OT: Super Anti War Computers"
- In reply to: KT: "Re: facial , hand , voice ,fingerprint and camera"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: chris@nospam.com Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 00:10:50 -0800
On 11 Mar 2003 22:26:20 -0800, kennedyel_5000@yahoo.com (KT) wrote:
>Hi Chris
>
>In what situation do you think the facial biometric device is the best
>compare to hand, finger print, eye and voice
Various people have demonstrated how easily the 1st generation devices
can be fooled. Perhaps later generations will be less likely to be
fooled. An example would be using infrared to look for proper average
temp and normal variations (say around eyes) to ensure the camera
wasn't looking at a photo.
In many ways, it's simply not a practical alternative to the
traditional passwords.
- Next message: Jim Grimmett: "Re: WLAN public access"
- Previous message: Lassi Hippeläinen: "OT: Super Anti War Computers"
- In reply to: KT: "Re: facial , hand , voice ,fingerprint and camera"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]