Re: SSL Certificate - Self-Generated vs 3rd Party ?
From: Alun Jones (alun@texis.com)
Date: 03/11/03
- Next message: Doah: "Re: security+"
- Previous message: Bill Todd: "Re: Super Anti War Computers"
- In reply to: Mark H. Wood: "Re: SSL Certificate - Self-Generated vs 3rd Party ?"
- Next in thread: John Elsbury: "Re: SSL Certificate - Self-Generated vs 3rd Party ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: alun@texis.com (Alun Jones) Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 22:44:59 GMT
In article <b4kt6o$e60$1@hood.uits.indiana.edu>, "Mark H. Wood"
<mwood@mhw.ULib.IUPUI.Edu> wrote:
>Interesting. Purchasing cert.s via email from some host claiming to
>be Verisign is considered more secure than hand delivery of home-baked
>cert.s by people known to each other by sight. Who'd a thunk it?
Shows what a good job Verisign et al have done on the marketing. I wonder
what would happen if they turned as much energy towards security and
reliability?
Alun.
~~~~
[Please don't email posters, if a Usenet response is appropriate.]
-- Texas Imperial Software | Try WFTPD, the Windows FTP Server. Find us at 1602 Harvest Moon Place | http://www.wftpd.com or email alun@texis.com Cedar Park TX 78613-1419 | VISA/MC accepted. NT-based sites, be sure to Fax/Voice +1(512)258-9858 | read details of WFTPD Pro for XP/2000/NT.
- Next message: Doah: "Re: security+"
- Previous message: Bill Todd: "Re: Super Anti War Computers"
- In reply to: Mark H. Wood: "Re: SSL Certificate - Self-Generated vs 3rd Party ?"
- Next in thread: John Elsbury: "Re: SSL Certificate - Self-Generated vs 3rd Party ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|