Re: Super Anti War Computers
From: jmfbahciv@aol.com
Date: 03/10/03
- Next message: Lassi Hippeläinen: "Re: Super Anti War Computers"
- Previous message: jmfbahciv@aol.com: "Re: Super Anti War Computers"
- In reply to: Bill Unruh: "Re: Super Anti War Computers"
- Next in thread: Lassi Hippeläinen: "Re: Super Anti War Computers"
- Reply: Lassi Hippeläinen: "Re: Super Anti War Computers"
- Reply: Bernd Paysan: "Re: Super Anti War Computers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: jmfbahciv@aol.com Date: Mon, 10 Mar 03 11:57:35 GMT
In article <b4g8q1$a6q$1@nntp.itservices.ubc.ca>,
unruh@string.physics.ubc.ca (Bill Unruh) wrote:
>jmfbahciv@aol.com writes:
>
>]In article <3e6a99e7@news.victoria.tc.ca>,
>] uj797@victoria.tc.ca (Arthur T. Murray) wrote:
>]>"Dennis M O'Connor" <dmoc@primenet.com> wrote on Sat, 8 Mar 2003:
>]>>
><a stupid reference to Poland and the Nazis in 1939 erased>
>
>]Poland wasn't waving anthrax around nor was it harboring
>]al Queda.
>
>Well, actually neither is Iraq.
I said harboring; I didn't say they had specific contracts.
They also allow transport through. The al Queda still has
money to buy stuff.
> ...The evidence for links to AlQueda are
>much stronger for Saudi Arabia or Pakistan than for Iraq. And the only
>Anthrax attacks have been carried out by rogue Americans on the USA.
>
>While Sadam is certainly a pretty disgusting ruler, Mugabe or Kim are
>much worse.
I'm not worried about bad ruling. I'm interested in mess prevention.
/BAH
Subtract a hundred and four for e-mail.
- Next message: Lassi Hippeläinen: "Re: Super Anti War Computers"
- Previous message: jmfbahciv@aol.com: "Re: Super Anti War Computers"
- In reply to: Bill Unruh: "Re: Super Anti War Computers"
- Next in thread: Lassi Hippeläinen: "Re: Super Anti War Computers"
- Reply: Lassi Hippeläinen: "Re: Super Anti War Computers"
- Reply: Bernd Paysan: "Re: Super Anti War Computers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|