Re: SSL Certificate - Self-Generated vs 3rd Party ?
From: Dimitri Maziuk (dima@127.0.0.1)
Date: 03/10/03
- Previous message: Charles Shannon Hendrix: "Re: Super Anti War Computers"
- In reply to: Dan: "SSL Certificate - Self-Generated vs 3rd Party ?"
- Next in thread: Alun Jones: "Re: SSL Certificate - Self-Generated vs 3rd Party ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Dimitri Maziuk <dima@127.0.0.1> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 06:57:34 +0000 (UTC)
Dan sez:
> My company is going to use SSL to communicate with a business partner;
> that is we are trusted parties. I realize that the only way to
> guarantee true identity is to use a 3rd party certificate manager like
> Verisign.
Why? Verisign tells you that "someone who claims to be such-and-such
paid us to tell everyone that this particular key belongs to them".
Your business partner, OTOH, can write their key fingerprint on a
piece of paper and bring it to your office. Why would anyone rather
trust Verisign than people they know and work with?
Dima
--
Yes, Java is so bulletproofed that to a C programmer it feels like being in a
straightjacket, but it's a really comfy and warm straightjacket, and the world
would be a safer place if everyone was straightjacketed most of the time.
-- Mark 'Kamikaze' Hughes
- Previous message: Charles Shannon Hendrix: "Re: Super Anti War Computers"
- In reply to: Dan: "SSL Certificate - Self-Generated vs 3rd Party ?"
- Next in thread: Alun Jones: "Re: SSL Certificate - Self-Generated vs 3rd Party ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]