Re: sounds like "damage control" to me... (Was: Wallwatcher IS NOT spyware.....MY ERROR!!!)

From: David (davidwnh@adelphia.net)
Date: 12/28/02 

From: "David" <davidwnh@adelphia.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 22:51:03 GMT

Put a sniffer on it and make an informed statement. When you realize how
much misinformation is dispersed through Usenet and on websites authored by
those who "know it all" you might learn how to verify things yourself.

> >> >> >I have verifed that WW DOES initiate internet traffic
> >> >
> >> good edit! ;)~
> >
> >WW does NOT initiate traffic,
> >
> yeah yeah yeahhhh...
>
> then explain why the dork that "created" it felt the need to don his
> sock puppets and post identical "damage control" (verbatim) under two
> different nicks, hrmmmmm? he spoofed the nick of the person that
> posted the original warning, then used another nickname in a different
> froup. the proof is in the puddin':
>
>
>http://groups.google.com/groups?q=%22verifed+that+WW%22&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&h
l=en
>
> i think the odds of two different people posting the same message
> word-for-word on the same day in two different groups apologizing for
> blowing the whistle are a little high, don't you? that's where i get
> my damage control theory. and based on this behavior, there is no way
> in hedes that i'd ever suggest that anyone even so much as consider
> going anywhere near this product.

Relevant Pages
Quantcast