netstat makes a Firewall redundant?
From: dbc@dbc.dbc
Date: 12/27/02
- Next message: Duane Arnold: "Re: netstat makes a Firewall redundant?"
- Previous message: JLH: "Re: help!"
- Next in thread: Duane Arnold: "Re: netstat makes a Firewall redundant?"
- Reply: Duane Arnold: "Re: netstat makes a Firewall redundant?"
- Reply: Bill Crocker: "Re: netstat makes a Firewall redundant?"
- Reply:(deleted message) Leythos: "Re: netstat makes a Firewall redundant?"
- Reply: Conor Turton: "Re: netstat makes a Firewall redundant?"
- Reply: johnekus: "Re: netstat makes a Firewall redundant?"
- Reply: Lik Mai Sak: "Re: netstat makes a Firewall redundant?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 15:01:27 +0000 From: dbc@dbc.dbc
Windows95A, 56K modem, single standalone home use.
When I connect to the net via dial-up modem and do "netstat -a" in DOS
I see no output (other than 2 lines of 127.0.0 which is safe). If I
connect to www.microsoft.com I EXPECT to see that line appearing. So if
all connections are "as expected" I'm safe? Doing netstat regularly is
a firewall still then necessary? "netstat [interval]" executes it so
many seconds.
If the IP address under "Local Address" is my ISP then I'm not being
hacked?
PS The fact I only see 2 lines when I connect is proof I have ALL ports
closed (via following instructions at www.grc.com) or just removed the
NetBIOS/NetBEUI thingy?
"nbtstat -n" gives "Failed to access NBT driver 1" is this good?
"If you are using the very first release of Windows 95 (build 950) your
TCP/IP Properties dialog will NOT have a NetBIOS tab! Nor will you be
able to close port 139 by unbinding all Microsoft services! I waited
until now to mention this since unbinding unneeded services is still
what you want to do for security. If you want to close port 139, you
can either rename the file "c:\windows\system\vnbt.386" to something
else"
BTW, can someone list useful commands e.g. netstat, nbtstat, arp.
What exactly is arp for?
- Next message: Duane Arnold: "Re: netstat makes a Firewall redundant?"
- Previous message: JLH: "Re: help!"
- Next in thread: Duane Arnold: "Re: netstat makes a Firewall redundant?"
- Reply: Duane Arnold: "Re: netstat makes a Firewall redundant?"
- Reply: Bill Crocker: "Re: netstat makes a Firewall redundant?"
- Reply:(deleted message) Leythos: "Re: netstat makes a Firewall redundant?"
- Reply: Conor Turton: "Re: netstat makes a Firewall redundant?"
- Reply: johnekus: "Re: netstat makes a Firewall redundant?"
- Reply: Lik Mai Sak: "Re: netstat makes a Firewall redundant?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|